When Profit Leads the Prophet
Many local churches are run like businesses these
days. Ministry philosophies are
established based upon market driven philosophies of the business
world. Then, those using these secular
philosophies for church growth determine if these practices are blessed by God
merely by measuring the results they achieve.
This is known as Pragmatism – the larger the crowd you can gather, the
greater God’s blessing. All this
nonsense is what God calls “the doctrine of Balaam.” It is the doctrine of the
“stumblingblock.” There are numerous
variations of the doctrine of the “stumblingblock.” It is a doctrine of manipulation of people
for personal gain.
“14 But I have a few things against thee,
because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac
to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things
sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. 15 So hast thou
also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans: which thing I hate” (Revelation
2:14-15).
In
the early church, there were already those who held to the “doctrine of
Balaam.” This “doctrine” is detailed
in the Old Testament in Numbers 22:5 through 23:24. Balaam was a prophet of God. He was the typical hireling prophet. The Bible has much to say about Balaam. Mainly, the “doctrine of Balaam” was
integrating paganism or worldliness with Christianity. The “doctrine of Balaam” was to abandon the
doctrine of separation in order to ripe the rewards of the world. In II Peter 2:15 God speaks of “the way of
Balaam.”
“Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone
astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the
wages of unrighteousness” (II Peter 2:15).
The
“way of Balaam” was that he was a spiritual opportunist. He saw the opportunity for fame and fortune in
his position as a prophet of God. He
traded his God given gift for profit, power, and position in the world. He made merchandise of both his ministry and
the people God called him to serve. The
“way of Balaam” is the person who views people as the means to advance himself
and build himself a kingdom. The “way of Balaam” is similar to the Purpose Driven ministries of New
Evangelicalism (meaning GATHERING CROWDS).
Pastors who take this avenue for personal success are not Christ’s under shepherds. Beware of prophets who are led by profit
rather than by the Word of God. When a
spiritual leader begins to measure his success by results, it will not be long
before he will be deep in compromise and Pragmatism.
Ministries get into trouble when they
try to maintain status qou even when
their numbers decrease or their budget decreases, or when costs increase. In many cases, local churches, Bible
Colleges, and Seminaries make ministry decisions on growth projections. Ministries get themselves in trouble when
they begin to budget according to growth
projections. When their growth projections are
not realized, and they get into financial difficulties, they begin to make
incremental changes in their philosophies of ministry to achieve their growth projections. These
incremental changes are often varying levels of compromise of their original
parameters of separation and doctrinal distinctives. At this point, the leaders of these
ministries cease to be spiritual leaders and become prophets for hire. There is
often a very narrow line between being extra-biblical and unbiblical.
“11 I am the good shepherd: the good
shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. 12 But he that is an
hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf
coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and
scattereth the sheep. 13 The hireling fleeth, because he is an
hireling, and careth not for the sheep” (John 10:11-13).
“And through covetousness shall they with feigned
words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not,
and their damnation slumbereth not” (II Peter 2:3).
The Bible also speaks of the “error of
Balaam.”
“Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain,
and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the
gainsaying of Korah” (Jude 1:11).
The “error of Balaam” is the “way of
Cain.” The “error of Balaam” is
primarily the error in thinking that any way
(methodology) is acceptable to God as long as it get RESULTS (Pragmatism). The “way of Cain” is to think that God can
bless the work of our hands apart from the proper relationship that comes
through the proper sacrifice. The “error
of Balaam” is the false thinking of the corrupted prophet who believes he
exists to make a profit or to gain fame for himself. The corrupted prophet uses his position for self-glorification, rather than God-glorification. He wants to be exalted before men, rather
than exalt God before men and edify men before God. Every true man of God must be meticulous in
his efforts to guard against thinking that might even lead him down these
pathways. Paul warned Timothy to – “Take
heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them” (I Timothy 4:16). If this is a warning to preachers, why do the
people in the pew need to know about it?
People in the pew need to know because they are responsible for any
unscriptural direction in which they might be led.
“For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat
and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee” (Proverbs
23:7).
These two philosophies of ministry are
called the “doctrine of Balaam” by Christ in Revelation 2:14. The Christian is called to preach the
doctrine of Christ. In other words, we
are to seek to reproduce Christ in others by “renewing” their minds and
allowing the Holy Spirit to “transform” their lives from the inside out. A man reproduces what he is. He is what he believes. The “doctrine of Balaam” reproduces what Balaam
was. Balaamism uses and distorts the
Scriptures to get the RESULTS Balaam wanted.
It is an insidious kind of corruption.
It is New Evangelicalism. It is Gospel
Centrism. It is Convergent and Emergent
Evangelicalism. All of these corrupt
the biblical doctrine of separation in varying degrees.
Balaam
taught the Moabite king Balak how to corrupt God’s children by breaching the
walls of their separation from the world.
King Balak wanted Balaam to curse the Israelites so that they wouldn’t
occupy his land, but Balaam could not.
He wanted to, but he could not. He
wanted to because he wanted king Balak’s reward. So Balaam taught king Balak what he needed to
do to seduce the children of Israel into compromise in order that God would
chastise Israel, rather than bless them.
In doing, Balaam could get his material reward. Balaam is the prophet influenced by
worldliness. The “doctrine of Balaam”
was that he taught the men of Israel to fornicate with and marry Moabite women thereby
defiling their separation unto God. This
is exactly what New Evangelicalism has done.
It is similar to what Gospel Centrism proposes. Paul had a similar problem with the believers
at Corinth and so admonished them.
“11 O ye Corinthians, our mouth is
open unto you, our heart is enlarged. 12 Ye are not straitened in
us, but ye are straitened in your own bowels. 13 Now for a
recompense in the same, (I speak as unto my children,) be ye also
enlarged. 14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers:
for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion
hath light with darkness? 15 And what concord hath Christ with
Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? 16 And
what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the
living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and
they shall be my people. 17 Wherefore come out from among them, and
be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I
will receive you, 18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be
my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. 1 Having therefore
these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of
the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (II Corinthians
6:11-7:1).
As a result of Balaam’s doctrine (and
the similar problem at Corinth), God’s children became involved in pagan
worship and the fornication of Baalism. New
Evangelicalism always begins with toleration
of error and ends with a rapid slide into false practice. Whatever you begin to fix your eyes on will
eventually become what you practice.
Take separation away from Christianity and you have Balaamism.
“Historic fundamentalism is the literal interpretation
of all the affirmations and attitudes of the Bible and the militant exposure of
all non-biblical affirmations and attitudes” (George Dollar, A History of
Fundamentalism in America, 1973).
“The essence of fundamentalism . . . is the
unqualified acceptance of and obedience to the Scriptures. . . The present study reveals that pre-1930
fundamentalism was nonconformist, while post-1930 fundamentalism has been
separatist” (David O. Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism
Since 1850, Bob Jones University Press, 1986, p. 5).
“Fundamentalism is the militant belief and
proclamation of the basic doctrines of Christianity leading to a Scriptural
separation from those who reject them” (John Ashbrook, Axioms of Separation,
nd., p. 10).
“A
fundamentalist is a born-again believer in the Lord Jesus Christ who:
1. Maintains
an immovable allegiance to the inerrant, infallible, and verbally inspired
Bible.
2. Believes
that whatever the Bible says is so.
3. Judges
all things by the Bible and is judged only by the Bible.
4. Affirms
the foundational truths of the historic Christian Faith: The doctrine of the
Trinity; the incarnation, virgin birth, substitutionary atonement, bodily
resurrection and glorious ascension, and Second Coming of the Lord Jesus
Christ; the new birth through regeneration by the Holy Spirit; the resurrection
of the saints to life eternal; the resurrection of the ungodly to final
judgment and eternal death; the fellowship of the saints, who are the body of
Christ.
5. Practices
fidelity to that Faith and endeavors to preach it to every creature.
6. Exposes
and separates from all ecclesiastical denial of that Faith, compromise with
error, and apostasy from the Truth.
7. Earnestly
contends for the Faith once delivered.”
(World
Congress of Fundamentalists, which met in 1976 in Usher Hall, Edinburgh,
Scotland)
Anonymous comments will not be allowed.
Numerous studies and series are available free of charge for local churches at: http://www.disciplemakerministries.org/
Dr. Lance Ketchum serves the Lord as a Church Planter, Evangelist/Revivalist.
He has served the Lord for over 40 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment