I have received a number of emails from pastors around the country expressing concerns about the Integrated Family Movement. Although I find that many things they say are true, I also greatly disagree with the way they force a philosophy of the family upon local churches claiming that any form of age divided or gender divided Bible study classes, even a nursery or Cry Room in a local church, is intent up dividing the family. The following article by Pastor Rench presents a biblical answer to the accusations of the Integrated Family Movement.
Mrs. Doris Aikens Sunday School Class 1957
Is Sunday School Biblical?
W.M. Rench
Calvary Baptist
Church
Temecula,
California
“Is Sunday school biblical?” Usually such a question means: “Is it right,
or should it be practiced? Should we
participate in it? Is it the will of
God? Should it be supported, promoted and
encouraged as an essential part of the ministry of a church?”
There has arisen in recent days a
concerted effort by some groups in our country to cast aspersions on the
ministry of the Sunday school. This
movement was, in part at least, inspired by some very real and legitimate
concerns about what passes for “youth ministry” across the “evangelical” world.
Much of what is called youth ministry is about as far from a biblical
definition of ministry as one can get.
Young people do not need more entertainment with a pinch of religion
thrown in for accent, they need to be challenged to step up, take up the cross
and follow the Lord Jesus Christ.
The biblical format for a Sunday school
ministry is one that seeks to reinforce and encourage whatever biblical
training is taking place in the homes of the children and young people. We parents are charged with the
responsibility of teaching the Bible to our children, but a careful study of the
Word of God will reveal that God raises up teachers in the church. He calls and
equips them to teach others. He uses
them to be a blessing and help to children, young people and adults alike.
Certain groups, some with good intentions
and some with wrong motives, have attempted to denigrate Sunday schools using
carefully chosen wording to provoke negative connotations for graded Sunday
school classes. Their charges are that
the church seeks to divide the family and to drive a wedge between parents and
children. They will frequently repeat
terms like age segregated and family division. They make the charge that graded classes,
secular or Sunday school, are a recent creation of secular humanists. Further, they charge that classes tend to
promote the institutionalization of children and the goal of humanists that they
become wards of the State. They insist
that there is no support for the idea of such classes or schools in the Bible
or in the record of history. Just saying
it loudly, angrily and often does not make it so. They happen to be wrong on all the
aforementioned counts.
New Testament characters make mention of
schooling back through Old Testament history.
In Acts 7:22, Stephen refers to Moses’ schooling, saying he was “learned
in all the wisdom of the Egyptians.” Even
in the time of our Lord’s sojourn on earth there were such schools and they did
minister to age related groups. In fact,
the religious component in these schools was more prevalent than the other
educational disciplines.
Historian H.H. Meyer, writing in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia,
said;
“Synagogues with
attached schools for the young were to be found in every important Jewish
community. Public elementary schools,
other than those connected with the synagogues were of slower growth and do not
seem to have been common until sometime after Joshua Ben Gamala, (high priest
from 63-65 A.D.), ordered teachers to be appointed in every province and city to
instruct children having attained the age of 6-7 years. In the synagogue schools the hazzan, or attendant, not infrequently
served as schoolmaster.”
We find this well known office,
schoolmaster, recognized in Scripture in the book of Galatians, where it is
used as an analogy for the work that the Law of God does to guide men to
Christ. Webster’s Dictionary defines the
word as follows; 1.“The man who presides over and teaches a school; a teacher,
instructor, or preceptor of a school. 2.
He or that which disciplines, instructs and leads.
Fred H. Wright
in his book, Manners and Customs in Bible
Times, wrote, “The archaeological expedition conducted by Sir Charles L.
Woolley at Ur of the Chaldees, from 1922 to 1934 has proven there were schools
in the city of Abraham’s youth.” Wright
goes on to mention biblical and historical references to the school of the
prophets formed by Samuel. He also
writes of the synagogue schools that were prevalent at the time of Jesus’
childhood. He writes, “When Jesus grew
up as a boy in the village of Nazareth he no doubt attended the synagogue
school. The Jewish child was sent to
school in the fifth or sixth year of life.”
And then he points out, “Until the children were 10 years of age, the
Bible was the one textbook. From 10 to
15 the traditional law was the main subject dealt with, and the study of
theology as taught in the Talmud was taken up with those over 15 years of age.” Wright later makes reference to the
Rabbinical Schools common in Paul’s day.
He states, “As a young man of thirteen years of age, Saul of Tarsus came
to Jerusalem to begin his training under the great leader, Gamaliel.”
Paul even makes reference to this
influential teacher he had in the days of his youth: Acts 22:3 I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in
Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of
Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the
fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day. I trust that it is becoming evident to the
reader that the charge that there is no precedent for age related schools in
the Bible or in the historical record is unfounded.
“Wright goes on
in his account, quoting from Camden Cobern in The New Archeological Discoveries and Their Bearing on the New
Testament, “It is now known that there were 20 grammar schools in the great
city of Rome when the Apostle Paul first visited the city. Girls as well as boys were allowed to go to
school, but there is evidence that more boys than girls availed themselves of
the privilege.”
Wright explains that Paul’s reference to
a “schoolmaster” in Galatians came from a commonly known position in these
schools. Among the schoolmaster’s
responsibilities according to references in several ancient papyri, was the
task of getting those children under his care to and from school. Archeological discoveries in Ephesus indicate
that the school of Tyrannus Paul mentions using as a meeting place for the
church established there, was an elementary school.
The eminent historian Alfred Edersheim
in The Life and Times Of Jesus The
Messiah, gives us a portrait of the education of children in the Hebrew
culture at the time of Christ:
“The regular
instruction commenced in the fifth or sixth year (according to strength), when
every child was sent to school. There
can be no reasonable doubt that such schools existed throughout the land. We find references to them in almost every
period; indeed the existence of higher schools and Academies would not have
been possible without such primary instruction.” He wrote, “It was deemed unlawful to live in
a place where there was no school.”
He went on to
say, “For a long time it was not uncommon to teach in the open air; but this
must have been chiefly in connection with theological discussions, and the
instruction of youths. But the children
were gathered in the synagogues, or in School-houses, where at first they
either stood, teacher and pupils alike, or else sat on the ground in a semicircle, facing the
teacher, as it were, literally to carry into practice the prophetic saying,
‘Thine eyes shall see thy teachers.’”
He added, “Thus
encircled by his pupils,…the teacher should impart to them the precious
knowledge of the Law, with constant adaptation to their capacity, with
unwearied patience, intense earnestness, strictness tempered by kindness, but,
above all, with the highest object of their training ever in view. To keep children from all contact with vise;
to train them to gentleness, even when bitterest wrong had been received; to
show sin in its repulsiveness, rather than to terrify by its consequences; to train to strict truthfulness; to avoid all that might lead to disagreeable
or indelicate thoughts; and do this without showing partiality, without either
undo severity, or laxity of discipline, with judicious increase of study and
work, with careful attention to thoroughness in acquiring knowledge—all this
and more constituted the ideal set before the teacher, and made his office of
such high esteem in Israel.”
Concerning the particulars of class
structure in the Biblical era Edersheim writes;
“Up to ten years
of age, the Bible exclusively would be the textbook…The Talmud was taught in
the Academies, to which access could not be gained till after the age of
fifteen. Care was taken not to send a
child too early to school, nor to overwork him when there. For this purpose the school hours were fixed,
and attendance shortened during the summer months. Teaching in school would of course be greatly
aided by the services of the Synagogue, and the deeper influences of home
life.” He adds, “Besides, a school for
Bible study was attached to every academy, in which copies of the Holy
Scriptures would be kept.” He said, “Certain
sections were copied for the instruction of children. Among them, the history of the creation to
that of the flood; Lev. 1-9; and Numbers 1-10:35, are specifically
mentioned. It was in such circumstances
and under such influences, that the early years of Jesus passed.”
John Stambaugh and David Balch point out
the following in their book, The New
Testament in Its Social Environment, “The synagogue was a place of prayer,
where the congregation gathered on the Sabbath and on holy days. It was also a school, where the Torah was
studied; some of the excavated synagogues included separate rooms for instruction.”
(It sounds a lot like Sunday school doesn’t it?)
Ample evidence for the Biblical basis of
a Sunday School ministry is provided in the above citations. In addition, any diligent researcher can
produce a ponderous volume of such evidence for the following facts; that
schools have long existed; that Sunday schools, or Sabbath schools in various
forms have long existed; that these schools gave attention to distinctions in
ages of pupils; and that having classes with children in them was not viewed as
an attempt to divide families.
Some 20 different terms in the Scripture
show a distinction in age and indicate
differing levels of maturity, development and understanding. Searching the Scripture you will find at least
the following age related terms: a suckling, an infant, a babe, a weaned child, a little child, a child, boys
and girls, a little lad, a lad, a stripling, a youth, a young man, a man, a man of full age, an old man, an aged man, a very aged man, a
man well stricken in years and
finally, a man as good as dead. The
contention by some that the Bible does not use age based distinctions is
clearly groundless. Age graded Sunday school
classes simply recognize these distinctions in an organized fashion.
Parents who teach their children the
Scriptures do well. Parents who teach
their children the scriptures and
give them the opportunity to grow up in Sunday school classes do better. Parents who provide a biblical example for
their children to follow are wise.
Parents who provide that example and
allow their children to experience the example of godly Sunday school teachers
demonstrate the greater wisdom. Adults
who faithfully attend the church preaching services do well. Adults who also are found faithful to their
attendance in an Adult Sunday school class do better.
When the Psalmist declared he had more
understanding than all his teachers, (Psalm
119:99 I have more understanding than all my teachers: for thy testimonies are
my meditation.), he stated two truths that have been missed by those
administering the recent blows to the Sunday school ministry.
1. The Psalmist
had many teachers.
2. That fact provided him the great opportunity
of receiving the combined wisdom of all his teachers.
The production of an airliner is the
combined understanding of many minds rather than the wisdom of one mind. The best equipped for life and ministry are those
whose training is the result of many godly influences from the lives of
preachers and teachers.
Cliff Schimmels, in his book, All I Really Need To Know I Learned In
Sunday School, wrote of going to speak at a small country church on an icy
blustery winter’s day. He was surprised
to find it crowded full even on such a bad weather day. He reflected on his own upbringing in Sunday
school as he watched the children going to their classes. After the services he sat visiting with an
elderly man. He told Mr. Schimmels
fondly of his seventy plus years in that very Sunday school and of his blessed
memories of many Sunday school teachers.
Then Mr. Schimmels wrote, “I asked him why, after seventy years of being
in this Sunday school, he had chosen to risk life and limb to come out on a
treacherous morning like this. Surely he
had heard all the lessons by now and wasn’t expecting anything new. ‘Paul told me to come,’” he told me.” Schimmels tried to recall someone named Paul
who would have spoken so highly of him as a guest speaker that this man would
come out in such inclement weather.
Schimmels asked, “Paul who?”
With that the old man took out his well worn Bible and began to read, “But continue thou in the things which thou
hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to
make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus” 2 Timothy 3:14-15. He closed his Bible and said, “I learned
those verses in Sunday school before I learned to read.” We do right as parents when we allow the
influence and instruction of godly Sunday school teachers to come alongside our
own training of our children as we raise them up to love, honor and serve the
Lord Jesus Christ.
Anonymous comments will not be allowed.
Numerous studies and series are available free of charge for local churches at: http://www.disciplemakerministries.org/
Dr. Lance Ketchum serves the Lord as a Church Planter, Evangelist/Revivalist.
He has served the Lord for over 40 years.
2 comments:
Thank You Susan.
Although I agree with your comments, I think we need to be careful about broad, sweeping condemnations of Sunday School classes like those that occur in Integrated Family Movement. For instance, all of the Sunday School teachers at the church I pastor are college trained people. However, their most important qualifications are that they love the Lord, are godly people, love their children, spend a great deal of time preparing for the classes they teach, and are faithful in trying to bring people to Christ.
I have been in the ministry for over 40 years. The above paragraph describes the vast majority of people I know of that have worked with children. Why would godly parents NOT WANT to put their children under the influence of these kind of people to reinforce the values that the parents are trying to implement in the lives of their children?
Susan,
What you are referring to is not something I have EVER seen in any of the IFB I am familiar with. I know that what you describe does exist. I have heard others testify of the same kinds of abuses.
There are IFB that have no emphasis on applicationally driven discipleship. They have become so preoccupied with Church growth that they have lost their understanding of the assembling of the local church- "to perfect the saints for the work of the ministry."
However the answer to the problem is to correct the deficiency, not abandon the local church purpose that is ordained by God. The Integrated Family Movement is abandoning the local church for family/home churches (which are really are not churches at all). They then create another failure - no real evangelism.
Post a Comment